To all who have managed to get this far: 

 

In writing my previous response to Dmb it dawned to me that many of you may
not have ever done any formal research dealing with "Data".  Not to over
simplify the process but you generally  start out with a research question.
(What are the intellectual and social  differences of values of pre and post
Soviet liberated generations?)  Then you need to validate the significance
of the research question.  Then you need to establish methodology including
how data will be collected analyzed and interpreted in a reliable manner.
Then you collect the data analyze it interpret it and then draw conclusions
from the data.  Now this process is one of the many blessings of SOM.  What
the problem is with SOM is that for dealing with, let's say cultural
studies, how do you objectively approach some cultural phenomenon that you
would like to research that might shed some new and deeper meaning or
understanding.  Though I totally made up this Estonian research problem out
of thin air, however it could provide some valuable insight to the next
generation's perspective and how that could conceivably impact the future of
a country.  I realize this is a super generalization, but research, at its
heart,  is about providing a greater understanding and meaning about the
world around us.  I am guessing that is why Pirsig wanted to study Indians,
so as to share an understanding of them that provided as much meaning to
him.  The downside to SOM is that it is limited in its capacity to
understand the world around us.  MOQ jacks us up a little higher up the
mountain and gives a better view and understanding.   That being said there
is also a mountain of work to pull this off in any one of our lifetimes.
And to show you how messy it can get here is an example of what I mean.  

 

Ok we are still working with the same research question I made up.  Let's
say we will now interview Estonians from both groups and do a thematic
analysis of the data.  (Note this is the preverbal scalpel, that is going to
dissect the reality of the data)  We want to now take an interview (data)
and  tease out the social and intellectual themes that exist for later
comparison and contrast.  For this exercise I have created the following
interview with a made up person.   This will be messy and in a recent post
Bodvar suggested that social and intellectual levels are so intertwined that
it is extremely difficult to separate them, he is more right than he knows.
Then again it was Leonardo Di Vinci that managed to tease out the
circulatory system out of a cadaver and gave us greater understanding of the
world inside us.  

 

For those of you who think I am a bit nutty, let me remind you we are all
hanging from the same walnut tree and let me also share a research question
that should be more familiar to you.

 

Does Lila have Quality?

 

Pirsig gave us Lila who had all the values except she was lacking intellect
by his standards set by MOQ.   Now let me introduce you to Reet. 

 

Reet, 26 year old, female, single, lives in Tallian the Capital of Estonia,
Employed by BAL Financial Group, college educated - University of Tartu

 

Question: "Describe how you see your future and the future of Estonia." 

 

 Transcript of Reet's response (Data): "My boyfriend Karl and I have talked
about that a lot lately.  Karl has a good job working installing basic
medical equipment and in the evening plays in band, "Ratsu Nellie" (War
Horse 5). I finally got an entry level position at a BAL Bank.  Though
economically Estonia has many challenges, we see a lot of opportunities as
well.  So we talk about what do and what we want to do with our lives.  We
love each other and hope to get married in the next two years but there is
some uncertainty of what our future will bring in terms careers and our
lives.  We are still looking for an apartment and I am still living with my
parents.  You know I finally have appreciated my parents pushing us in our
education and though there is uncertainly, we think we should be ok.  It is
like we are our parents future as much as ours.  Oh my, my mother was asking
me the other day about if Karl had thought about starting a family, I had to
laugh, "Mother we are not even married!"  We have both worked hard to get a
good start in life but it is slow however we feel good about the future,
cautious but good.  (Interviewer redirects the question to ask how she see
the future of Estonia) You know that is an interesting question, both Karl
and I have had to get our training outside of Estionia, I had two months in
Sweden and Karl regularly has to be trained in different in counties. So we
have seen how other people live and economically and Karl could work, let's
say Germany and earn 30% more than what he makes here.  When Estonia joined
the EU, people were a bit nervous about it, but if the world goes to
economic hell we won't be alone. (Reet Laughs)  There still is a lot of
corruption in the government that I believe is left over from the Soviet
days and the older generation that is struggling in new Estonia but I am
hopeful that over time we as a democratic state will be able to overcome
that.  Time will tell. No I don't think we will leave Estonia, though
several of our friends have. We both love Estonia, there are strong
traditional and cultural values such as music that is so much of who we are.
Our language is also unique, like Finish, but more beautiful to the ear, at
least to my ears.  So Karl and I have agreed our future is here.  As to
Estonia's future, we are a country that has been occupied throughout our
history, Danes, Swedes, Russia. and yet it has survived over and over.  We
are really the first generation in a long time that can make Estonia, our
Estonia.  My Grandmother was a very young girl when Soviets invaded our
country.  She used to tell me so many wonderful stories of her youth and how
it was.  I believe we can recapture some that, but more importantly we can
build on that and make it better.  At least for my mother grandchildren."
(Reet laughs).   (End of Question and the Interviewer thanks Reet for her
participation) 

 

Scalpels ready, if you  think you know the difference between the
intellectual and the social level, have at it.  If you think there is no
intellect in Reet's response, then where is it?   If you believe intellect
and social values cannot be delineated than we run the risk that MOQ might
be some pie in the sky house of metaphysical cards on a shaky table.

 

This all being said I will say this, I sincerely and respectfully don't
think this is the way Pirsig  intended for MOQ to be used, remember in MOQ
the scalpel first cut, SQ/DQ.  The fallout is the four levels of values that
are distinctive and discrete. DQ can't be defined, so SQ has to be.  I have
hung my hat on the point that if SOM mother of  all scientific research and
much of what we know about our world, then MOQ, stands to reason, should
have the same or greater capacity. 

 

This will be my last post until get my new email account sometime next week.


Respectfully submitted,

Mati 

 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to