Hi Peter' Glad to see that you are back!
Joe On 8/16/08 4:21 AM, "Peter Corteen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Marsha, > > I like your definitions. > > 'Analytic enquiry' conjures images of reasonable problem solving via subject > object logic for me; I consider subject object metaphysics as a slightly > whimsical intellectual practice. I can't reconcile SOM as the 4th level; SOL > yes, but SOM merely an indulgent diversion. > > Also, the conditioning force of social convention sounds right on the nose > too. > > I've lost my temper with some people in moq_discuss before now; when that > happens it's an indication that I've lost 'it'. No big deal, I can look for > 'it' again. 'It', the overview, the MoQ point of view, enlightenment, is a > momentary thing; it can happen for me when I realise I have unconsciously > contracted my whole body and that my awareness of my self has shrunk to my > frontal lobe. Remembering my body is the quickest way out of gumption traps > for me. > > -Peter > > 2008/8/15 MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 1:19 PM >> Subject: Re: [MD] Social & Intellectual Levels >> >> >> >>> >>> Ron, >>> >>> I would think that analytic inquiry is an intellectual tool (pattern) to >>> >>> develop better patterns. >>> >>> I'm a conventional girl, living in a conventional world. And I'm not >>> sure I >>> have other choices available at the moment, or would have it any other >>> way. >>> How would one arrive at the conclusion that the MOQ is a better >>> world-view >>> than SOM if not for some good healthy analytic inquiry? How would one >>> understand that entities are empty of inherent existence, if not for >>> some >>> good healthy analytic inquiry? I'm not sure I'd be participating in >>> this >>> forum if it wasn't for my interest in analytic inquiry. (But I will >>> admit I >>> like to whirl and twirl into the moonlight when the mood hits me.) >>> >>> I'm not getting your objection. >>> >>> Marsha, >>> This is because you are already there, My reply >>> was more towards those who are not. >>> >>> You have it Marsha, You understand. >>> >>> -Ron >>> >> >> Ron, >> >> I'm not anywhere. I trying to see if the Intellectual Level and Social >> Level defined as follow works for others. >> >> >> Intellectual Level: Thought (patterns) established and emerging from >> analytic inquiry. >> >> Social Level: Thought (patterns) established by the force of convention. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ >> > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
