Hello Joe, I read other's posts on moq_discuss most days but rarely post myself; I don't know why I don't post more often - probably because it takes me a long time to write something serious.
-Peter 2008/8/17 Joseph Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi Peter' > > Glad to see that you are back! > > Joe > > > On 8/16/08 4:21 AM, "Peter Corteen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Marsha, > > > > I like your definitions. > > > > 'Analytic enquiry' conjures images of reasonable problem solving via > subject > > object logic for me; I consider subject object metaphysics as a slightly > > whimsical intellectual practice. I can't reconcile SOM as the 4th level; > SOL > > yes, but SOM merely an indulgent diversion. > > > > Also, the conditioning force of social convention sounds right on the > nose > > too. > > > > I've lost my temper with some people in moq_discuss before now; when that > > happens it's an indication that I've lost 'it'. No big deal, I can look > for > > 'it' again. 'It', the overview, the MoQ point of view, enlightenment, is > a > > momentary thing; it can happen for me when I realise I have unconsciously > > contracted my whole body and that my awareness of my self has shrunk to > my > > frontal lobe. Remembering my body is the quickest way out of gumption > traps > > for me. > > > > -Peter > > > > 2008/8/15 MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 1:19 PM > >> Subject: Re: [MD] Social & Intellectual Levels > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> Ron, > >>> > >>> I would think that analytic inquiry is an intellectual tool (pattern) > to > >>> > >>> develop better patterns. > >>> > >>> I'm a conventional girl, living in a conventional world. And I'm not > >>> sure I > >>> have other choices available at the moment, or would have it any other > >>> way. > >>> How would one arrive at the conclusion that the MOQ is a better > >>> world-view > >>> than SOM if not for some good healthy analytic inquiry? How would one > >>> understand that entities are empty of inherent existence, if not for > >>> some > >>> good healthy analytic inquiry? I'm not sure I'd be participating in > >>> this > >>> forum if it wasn't for my interest in analytic inquiry. (But I will > >>> admit I > >>> like to whirl and twirl into the moonlight when the mood hits me.) > >>> > >>> I'm not getting your objection. > >>> > >>> Marsha, > >>> This is because you are already there, My reply > >>> was more towards those who are not. > >>> > >>> You have it Marsha, You understand. > >>> > >>> -Ron > >>> > >> > >> Ron, > >> > >> I'm not anywhere. I trying to see if the Intellectual Level and Social > >> Level defined as follow works for others. > >> > >> > >> Intellectual Level: Thought (patterns) established and emerging from > >> analytic inquiry. > >> > >> Social Level: Thought (patterns) established by the force of > convention. > >> > >> > >> Marsha > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Moq_Discuss mailing list > >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > >> Archives: > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > >> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > > Archives: > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
