At 04:14 PM 8/18/2008, you wrote:
Marsha
That's my choices for explaining these experiences: theology,
neuroscience and whatever's in-between. I am not impressed. But I'm
not sure what would impress me except the experiences themselves when
they occur naturally.
[Krimel]
What difference does it make if the experiences are natural or chemically or
electronically induced? Isn't the experience what counts not the mechanism
of induction?
Krimel,
Chemically induced is fine. I did five sessions with mushrooms, but
the experience was of my design and choosing. I don't want any group
in white lab coats overlaying their thoughts onto my experience. I'm
not hooked-up to a television for the same reason. I do not take any
legal drugs including aspirins. I can talk about the MOQ, but I
couldn't tell you very much about the celebrity scene. When I wrote
naturally, I meant without the help of the pharmaceutical companies.
Marsha
.
.
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
