Actually, Ron, SA, Godel's argument concerns any formal system of logic (not just mathematics per se) ... but it doesn't change your point, since the argument was part of the debate about whether mathematics and logic resolve to the same thing.
My son's recent dissertation was specifically on the subject of Godel's incompleteness and/or inconsistency in relation to systems of moral philosophy. Let me see if I can dig you out a copy ... Ian On 8/22/08, Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ron: > The fallacy, SA, is using a mathematical theorem to support > a metaphysical understanding. It supposes a cap on knowledge > and intellect when it is only a rarely used and one of many, > methods of reasoning. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
