Still looking Ron, for a copy I can post publicly ... But here is a key quote from the conclusion.
"The future for moral debate ... has to be concerned with the insurmountable dichotomy between complete and consistent moral systems. As we can no longer expect a unique answer to every situation, we have to decide which is more valuable." (Tom Glendinning, 2008) Ian On 8/22/08, Ron Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Actually, Ron, SA, > > Godel's argument concerns any formal system of logic (not just > mathematics per se) ... but it doesn't change your point, since the > argument was part of the debate about whether mathematics and logic > resolve to the same thing. > > My son's recent dissertation was specifically on the subject of > Godel's incompleteness and/or inconsistency in relation to systems of > moral philosophy. Let me see if I can dig you out a copy ... > > Ian > > Ian, > That would be excellent, I'd be most interested in reading it. > You got it, it's about axioms. > > sincerely, > -Ron > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
