MOQers:

This is my third attempt to post this message. Apologies if duplicates show up.

 
> dmb said to Bo:
> It seems to me that you must be suffering from a very odd definition of 
> "metaphysics" and "intellect". You seem to think the MOQ is reality itself 
> rather than words about reality and so you are altering the MOQ so that it is 
> construed as essentialism rather than philosophical mysticism, which is a 
> vigorous form of anti-essentialism.
> 
> Bo replied:
> Yes if that is essentialism I'm very much so, but because DQ is part and 
> parcel of the MOQ I wonder how you avoid being a Quality essentialist too ... 
>  without resorting to the Quality//DQ/SQ variety that even Pirsig finally had 
> to abandon. 
> 
> dmb says:
> Pirsig's Quality is opposed to Plato's Quality precisely because it is not an 
> essence. We can find this anti-essentialist move in what I take to be the 
> philosophical and dramatic climaxes of ZAMM....
> 
> But why? Phædrus wondered. Why destroy areté? And no sooner had he asked the 
> question than the answer came to him. Plato hadn't tried to destroy areté. He 
> had encapsulated it; made a permanent, fixed Idea out of it; had converted it 
> to a rigid, immobile Immortal Truth. He made areté the Good, the highest 
> form, the highest Idea of all. It was subordinate only to Truth itself, in a 
> synthesis of all that had gone before.
> 
> That was why the Quality that Phædrus had arrived at in the classroom had 
> seemed so close to Plato's Good. Plato's Good was taken from the 
> rhetoricians. Phædrus searched, but could find no previous cosmologists who 
> had talked about the Good. That was from the Sophists. The difference was 
> that Plato's Good was a fixed and eternal and unmoving Idea, whereas for the 
> rhetoricians it was not an Idea at all. The Good was not a form of reality. 
> It was reality itself, ever changing, ultimately unknowable in any kind of 
> fixed, rigid way.
> 
> .....................
> 
> 
> What is good, Phædrus, and what is not good...need we ask anyone to tell us 
> these things?
> 
> It is what he was saying months before in the classroom in Montana, a message 
> Plato and every dialectician since him had missed, since they all sought to 
> define the Good in its intellectual relation to things. But what he sees now 
> is how far he has come from that. He is doing the same bad things himself. 
> His original goal was to keep Quality undefined, but in the process of 
> battling against the dialecticians he has made statements, and each statement 
> has been a brick in a wall of definition he himself has been building around 
> Quality. Any attempt to develop an organized reason around an undefined 
> quality defeats its own purpose. The organization of the reason itself 
> defeats the quality. Everything he has been doing has been a fool's mission 
> to begin with.
> 
> On the third day he turns a corner at an intersection of unknown streets and 
> his vision blanks out. When it returns he is lying on the sidewalk, people 
> moving around him as if he were not there. He gets up wearily and mercilessly 
> drives his thoughts to remember the way back to the apartment. They are 
> slowing down. Slowing down. This is about the time he and Chris try to find 
> the sellers of bunk beds for the children to sleep in. After that he does not 
> leave the apartment.
> 
> He stares at the wall in a cross-legged position upon a quilted blanket on 
> the floor of a bedless bedroom. All bridges have been burned. There is no way 
> back. And now there is no way forward either.
> 
> For three days and three nights, Phædrus stares at the wall of the bedroom, 
> his thoughts moving neither forward nor backward, staying only at the 
> instant. His wife asks if he is sick, and he does not answer. His wife 
> becomes angry, but Phædrus listens without responding. He is aware of what 
> she says but is no longer able to feel any urgency about it. Not only are his 
> thoughts slowing down, but his desires too. And they slow and slow, as if 
> gaining an imponderable mass. So heavy, so tired, but no sleep comes. He 
> feels like a giant, a million miles tall. He feels himself extending into the 
> universe with no limit.
> 
> He begins to discard things, encumbrances that he has carried with him all 
> his life. He tells his wife to leave with the children, to consider 
> themselves separated. Fear of loathsomeness and shame disappear when his 
> urine flows not deliberately but naturally on the floor of the room. Fear of 
> pain, the pain of the martyrs is overcome when cigarettes burn not 
> deliberately but naturally down into his fingers until they are extinguished 
> by blisters formed by their own heat. His wife sees his injured hands and the 
> urine on the floor and calls for help.
> 
> But before help comes, slowly, imperceptibly at first, the entire 
> consciousness of Phædrus begins to come apart -- to dissolve and fade away. 
> Then gradually he no longer wonders what will happen next. He knows what will 
> happen next, and tears flow for his family and for himself and for this 
> world. A fragment comes and lingers from an old Christian hymn, "You've got 
> to cross that lonesome valley." It carries him forward. "You've got to cross 
> it by yourself." It seems a Western hymn that belongs out in Montana.
> 
> "No one else can cross it for you," it says. It seems to suggest something 
> beyond. "You've got to cross it by yourself."
> 
> He crosses a lonesome valley, out of the mythos, and emerges as if from a 
> dream, seeing that his whole consciousness, the mythos, has been a dream and 
> no one's dream but his own, a dream he must now sustain of his own efforts. 
> Then even "he" disappears and only the dream of himself remains with himself 
> in it.
> 
> And the Quality, the areté he has fought so hard for, has sacrificed for, has 
> never betrayed, but in all that time has never once understood, now makes 
> itself clear to him and his soul is at rest.
> 
> dmb continues:
> We see this same paradox in LILA, where Pirsig says that philosophical 
> mystics have historically shared, "a common belief that the fundamental 
> nature of reality is outside of language; that language splits things up into 
> parts while the true nature of reality is undivided". He says, "Historically 
> mystics have claimed that for a true understanding of reality metaphysics is 
> too 'scientific'. Metaphysics is not reality. Metaphysics is NAMES about 
> reality." He says, "The central reality of mysticism, the reality that 
> Phaedrus had called 'Quality' in his first book, is not a metaphysical chess 
> piece. Quality doesn't have to be defined. You understand it without 
> definition, ahead of definition. Quality is a direct experience independent 
> of and prior to intellectual abstractions".
> 
> Let me put it this way, old friend. Dynamic Quality itself is reality but the 
> MOQ is not reality. It is names about reality, a set of intellectual static 
> patterns that describe reality with definitions and concepts. Like its rival, 
> the MOQ is a product of that analytic knife. In other words, the 
> deconstructive anti-essentialist moves against SOM have to be applied to the 
> MOQ too. Its categories and concepts are not to be confused with the primary 
> empirical reality from which they are derived any more than SOM's categories 
> and concepts. I mean, Pirsig is consistently anti-essentialist even with 
> respect to his own metaphysical system. Otherwise, the MOQ would be exempted 
> from the art gallery analogy and the whole thing would otherwise be full of 
> holes.
> 
> I think this is what gives rise to your SOLAQI. You're trying to solve 
> problems that don't really exist in the MOQ. The problems are a product of 
> your essentialist misinterpretation of the MOQ. Get rid of the essentialism 
> and the problems will evaporate.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get ideas on sharing photos from people like you.  Find new ways to share.
> http://www.windowslive.com/explore/photogallery/posts?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Photo_Gallery_082008

_________________________________________________________________
Get ideas on sharing photos from people like you.  Find new ways to share.
http://www.windowslive.com/explore/photogallery/posts?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Photo_Gallery_082008
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to