Krimel: > I find Pirsig's use of many terms sloppy. > "Experience" is one of them. It > has lead to the stagnation, confusion and lack of progress > in the MoQ. I > think Pirsig has remarkable instincts for pointing in the > right direction > but I am afraid that leaves many like yourself just staring > at his finger.
SA: To say "it (is) confus(ing)" is your assertion, and thus your confusion. Wouldn't a scientist, serious question, not allow confusion to stand in the way of data? I mean for one, I'm not confused by "experience". It is an event. And it seems others are not confused by it. Is there confusion? Apparently, but as my point in a recent post of mine considers, what ones psychology is, is also a part of how reality is for such a person. Thus, in reality, your reality, it is confusing, but I'm letting you know, moq's experience is not something that confuses me. [Krimel] Perhaps you don't find talk of the experiences of rocks and sponges confusing. Truth is I don't either. I find them laughable. What is confusing is why anyone would talk that way. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
