> [Platt] > Yes, Arlo is married to scientific reductionism wherein all emerges > magically > by chance from "DNA-driven evolution" and "growing complexity" while > playing > lip-service to the MOQ. Sad really. > > [Arlo] > Oh yes, stupid Arlo. Why are you so incapable of answering my basic > questions > then? Why run from them? At least Arlo gives honest answers.
Why do ask someone you consider a moron anything? > If not "chance", then are you saying that a "plan" existed a billion years > ago > to bring about "man"? Where did this plan reside? > > You and Ham both agree that there was a time in the historic timeline > when > consciousness did not exist, and now it does. You repeatedly use the > usual > moronic glib "oops" to refer to my position. So I ask. What is YOURS? > What > changed in the timeline? Do you agree with Ham that Qualigod (or > Essiegod) > poofed consciousness into the primates at some point in the timeline? > > I also assume you agree with Ham that "consciousness" evolved over > historic > times. Since my views on how are so woefully stupid and sad, then please > by all > means enlighten us all on your views. HOW does consciousness evolve over > time? > If it ain't genetic, and it ain't social, then how did the primates of one > time > have a more evolved consciousness than their distant ancestors? Do you > support > the "new and better model handed out by Qualigod" theory? If not, HOW? > > As for paying lip service to the MOQ, that's such a low blow that I am > embarrassed for you, Platt. I can, with exact detail, map my views onto > the > MOQ. How do you map "poof" and "new and improved models" onto the MOQ? > Since > all you seem to be capable of doing is deriding others, your claim here is > just > pathetic. > > > [Platt] > Yes, there is always hope that he and others will see that there's a lot > more > going on besides "neuro-biological complexity" and poof-like "unintended > consequences." > > [Arlo] > Answer my questions and tell us all "what". > > Answer us all as to "what changed" in the timeline that brought about > consciousness. All you offer is the Great Poof of Qualigod, is that what > you > hope others here will see? > > And I know you can't answer my questions. But have another go round at > "stupid > Arlo", it makes good distraction, and maybe you can even convince yourself > that > there is someone here (other than Ham) that does not see you for the > charlatan > you are. Why do you ask someone you consider a charlatan anything? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
