> > > [Arlo had asked]
> > > Ask yourself, SA, why do you think Platt feels he
> > > must resort to such blatant lies to mask his
> > > inability to answer these questions?
> > > [SA previously previously]
> > > I don't know.
> > >
> > > [Arlo then said]
> > > I think you're too kind. :-)
> >
> > SA previously: I don't know "why" he does it,
> other than to deceive, but deceive
> > limits the discussion. Maybe he's trying to hide
> something or is in the
> > middle of learning something but doesn't know how
> to explain this transition.?
Platt:
> What "blatant lies" do you think I have
> perpetrated?
SA: Well, I didn't use "blatant lies". I said "deceive", but maybe their both
mayapples. I think the point I was making was Arlo asked you questions and you
didn't answer them, and those questions are based on your 'evolve', 'need for
an origin', and 'intention' comments. If you say these events happen, but
don't provide an answer - without even an 'I don't know' comment, then what are
you holding back? Thus, why I grouped my answer with 'deception', 'hiding', or
'learning something'/'in transition'.
From my perspective, it's mainly been Ham, with his "consciousness
evolves" comment and then his blatant disregard to comment upon this quote of
his. He probably doesn't even know what his own words mean. It's his track
record. His 'mo'.
windy all day,
SA
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
