SA: > > [SA previously] > > Well, I didn't use "blatant lies". > > > > [Arlo] > > I did. After at least six (on my last count) times of > > answering the same > > questions I've been asking you and Ham, seeing nothing > > but evasion after > > evasion, this morning Platt wrote "Arlo can't even > > answer a few simple, direct > > questions." Perhaps Platt would care to produce one > > question I have not > > answered? > > SA: Arlo, your correct. Platt was asked many times, and then tried to > turn the tables on you. I followed the whole thread. Platt does go on to > say, "Why don't you (Arlo) answer some of my questions?" Platt this does > look like lying.
Asking question is lying? How so? > > [SA previously] > > If you say these events happen, but don't provide an > > answer - without even an > > 'I don't know' comment, then what are you > > holding back? Thus, why I grouped my > > answer with 'deception', 'hiding', or > > 'learning something'/'in transition'. > > > [Arlo] > > He is holding back because he is not here for honest > > dialogue, SA. As Pirsig > > said of the Chairman, he is not a Truth-Seeker but a > > propagandist for a > > particular ideology. He knows the absurdity of his claims, > > he knows they are a > > theist revision, but he won't be honest about that > > because then he loses the > > ability to act like he supports the MOQ. At the very least, > > Ham is honest in > > his opposition to the MOQ, even if he too is incapable to > > defend his absurd > > claims. > > SA: I find Bo to be even the worse of the worse in this forum. He's > trying to hijack the moq for himself all together, and even tries to rid > Pirsig from his own philosophy. Pirsig did all the work, and now Bo wants > it for himself. I haven't read the Pirsig letter to Bo thread yet, but > looking forward to it. Again I'm surprised at your personal accusations. > > [SA previously] > > >From my perspective, it's mainly been Ham, with his > > "consciousness evolves" > > comment and then his blatant disregard to comment upon this > > quote of his. He > > probably doesn't even know what his own words mean. > > It's his track record. > > His 'mo'. > > > > [Arlo] > > Ham and Platt share this same theist > > "Qualigod/Essigod" view. So the parallel > > in questioning is natural. There was one that preempted > > this one about > > evolution, and that is "what changed?" I've > > answered this several times, and > > each time I get "no no no, stupid reductionist > > Arlo". Fine, I said, if I am > > wrong, if the physiologists are wrong, then what is right? > > What, according to > > the Qualigod view, changed during the timeline that left > > "no consciousness" on > > one side and "consciousness" on the other. My > > view was assailed as "oops". As > > moronic as that is, I don't care, but then I asked > > "what do YOU think?" Both > > have been unable to answer, as their only answer > > "Qualigod poofed it into the > > timeline" reveals not only their theism, but their > > inability to even articulate > > a decent theistic proposal. In the end, all that's left > > is a sad dishonesty and > > use of lies that really should be something they reflect on > > in quiet. You see, > > I too, SA, have hopes that somewhere inside there is > > something that would be > > ashamed at the chicanery they perpetrate here. But I am a > > cynic, and you appear > > to have more hope than I. > > SA: Arlo, I go on and on about Ham and Bo, and I've done this, especially > with Ham, for over a year. Bo likes the moq, but even that's deceptive > for this kind of moq he likes is what he likes to think as HIS moq. He's > trying to take possession of the moq for himself. When you find out about > the moq he likes, it's not the moq I read in ZMM and Lila, it's Bo's > hijacked moq. His philosophy is not only tyrannical, it's a monstrous > dictorial empire on the loose looking for geography to take over. > Maybe we're both looking for others to stand up more often and take > notice of what's happening. I like how Ron stands up to Bo, and how > Marsha and dmb stand up to Ham. I like how you stand up to Platt and call > him out. Anybody want to call out on me. Peter tried to recently, but > found he was mistaken. I'm glad, though, we all stand up to each other > and keep it verbal. Saw on a website news story that police have arrested > these men that were possibly planning to murder Obama for racial reasons > and how Obama might actually become president - how dare that black man! > (sarcastic) Now, those people are takin' it too far obviously, murder... > over his color, that's pretty gosh darn stupid, but I guess there are some > pretty gosh darn stupid people livin' on this earth (and then I spit on > the ground while I pull my pants up)... hahahha! [laughin' at myself; good > night] Far out. Platt Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
