> > > Platt: "Hijacking" is a crime. A > > "hijacker" is a criminal." Same with > > accusing Bo of "stealing." That's how > > it's a personal attack. > > SA: Platt, use some common sense. I didn't say Bo hijacked a plane or > anything. I'm pointing out he's trying to take the moq for himself, and > rid Pirsig of even knowing what the moq is. In my dictionary, "taking > something over" means hijack, which incidently a different definition does > point out that hijacking can be a legal issue, but I'm not talking about > that. I can tell your out for an argument. Do you still not like > "analogies"? curious.
SA, use your head. To accuse Bo of "hijacking the MOQ" is a personal attack. To say he "interprets the MOQ differently than you" is not. > Platt: > > Further, I guess you never read Pirsig's words about his opinion > > being no "Papal > > Bull." > > SA: What's that mean? Look it up. > Platt: > > Finally, what "core issues" is Bo "tearing down?" > > SA: Bo's trying to say the moq is about s/o (the SOM objective kind) and > that the moq is essentialist (he doesn't recognize the undefined dq). > They latter is a recent argument of his that dmb was involved with. The > former strikes at the core of what the moq is arguing against from the > very beginning, middle and end. Can't get much more contrary than that. > Have you not read any of Ron's posts or mine or Ian's or dmb's on this > issue? Probably have, and you'll find something to argue against this > probably, so, I'm not in for a debate at the moment. I would say, lurk, > read the posts on Bo, especially the recent ones that Ron has put forth. > Their enlightening and as you can see these discussions on these issues > have been on going and have taken many, many posts to fully discuss. So, > I'm not sitting here all day and night to explain everything. Sorry. But > if you lurk, to help guide you in a good direction if this answer doesn't > satisfy you, you'll > see more and more about where Bo has transformed the moq into something > else that I would say would mean Bo needs to come up with a new name for > his philosophy and stop saying it is the moq. Sorry, I don't follow you. I don't think Bo is saying what you say he is saying at all. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
