>> [Arlo] > > Do you think Krimel's "spontaneously arising configurations > > of order" is more "sophisticated?" > > [Ham] > I haven't been able to locate a Krimel statement with these specific > quoted references, although "spontaneously arising" is always problematic.
[Platt] "Problematic" is very kind considering this articulates the faith of science while at the same time demeaning faith. [Krimel] It does not require faith to observe, hurricanes, tornados, dust devils, jet streams, ocean currents, whirlpools, soap bubbles, clouds, crystals, stars, planets, galaxies, elliptical orbits, seasons, volcanoes, lunar phases, aurora borealis, lightning bolts, sand dunes, snow flakes, rainbows, ripples and river beds. "Good order results spontaneously when things are let alone." - Chuang-tzu Static order goes Where dynamic fluid flows What's the problem? - Case Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
