> >> [Arlo] > > > Do you think Krimel's "spontaneously arising configurations > > > of order" is more "sophisticated?" > > > > [Ham] > > I haven't been able to locate a Krimel statement with these specific > > quoted references, although "spontaneously arising" is always > problematic. > > > [Platt] > "Problematic" is very kind considering this articulates the faith of > science while at the same time demeaning faith. > > [Krimel] > It does not require faith to observe, hurricanes, tornados, dust devils, > jet > streams, ocean currents, whirlpools, soap bubbles, clouds, crystals, > stars, > planets, galaxies, elliptical orbits, seasons, volcanoes, lunar phases, > aurora borealis, lightning bolts, sand dunes, snow flakes, rainbows, > ripples > and river beds.
[Platt] I remind you of the logical fallacy of False Analogy. > "Good order results spontaneously when things are let alone." > - Chuang-tzu [Platt] A basic conservative principle. Thanks for the quote. > Static order goes > Where dynamic fluid flows > What's the problem? > - Case [Platt] Dynamic and static go together like inside and outside. You can't have one without the other. What's the point? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
