Hello Mel,
> (RK) > This overlap we call Quality, this overlap we call self. > (mel) Question: Was this a 'hard mapping' or 'parallel contrast' ? ie: Quality = overlap, overlap = self, ergo Quality = self (hard map) or was this to say that self is empty and only meaningful through quality? (parallel contrast) or, of course, something else entirely... Ron: Parallel contrast. In light of the current discussion regarding self, I wanted to stress that value relationships eclipse identity. Quality value relationships, I feel, are hindered by false identities. When I say false identity I mean a fictionally created character, Not a pseudonym. Some would argue there is little difference between projection and preconception. > (RK) > We define our Quality at every moment. (mel) You are right in that it is imperative that we seek to understand, apprehend, attend to Quality in its constant unfolding. Ron: I believe Quality is experience and experience, pattern recognition? "the act of taking in raw data and taking an action based on the category of the data". Therefore to conceptualize patterns as collections of active/passive entities is misleading. Rather, active/passive is a description of experience. A pattern is a theme of reoccurring events which repeat in a predictable manner. The more predictable the more "static" the pattern is perceived to be. Perhaps speaking in terms of predictability would be more accurate to MoQ meaning. (mel) Seriously, though, thanks for the opportunity to twist myself through the trellis of these words. thanks--mel Ron: It has been a pleasure, I am grateful that you chose to comment. Thank you. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
