[gav]
law vs lore....the aborigines can shed a lot of light on this one.

you know, the etymologies must be related i reckon - law must have evolved
from lore - the static vine strangling the ineffable dynamic source again.

[Krimel]
Just to be annoying I thing science evolves from lore; medicine and
agriculture from herbalism, astronomy form astrology... Law is unnecessary
in the days of yore in the land of lore. In bands of 100 are so everyone
knows everyone else. Ethics and morality are negotiated one on one. You
don't need formal codes to mediate your interactions with folks you know.
Laws arose with cities. When there are more people around than names you can
remember that's when trouble starts. Formal codes help reduce the
uncertainty we face when dealing with strangers. 

And just as a side note: Pattern recognition, negotiation of meaning, memory
and language; the panoply of human superpowers are all aimed at reducing
uncertainty. Since I think DQ is "uncertainty", I think reducing DQ at one
level promotes new forms of DQ at higher levels. So I would have to say that
creating and promoting Static Quality is a good thing.



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to