Platt:

Yeah, blame Ham or anyone else who doesn't think like you. I'm shocked and
offended. Quality doesn't get much lower than that.

Andre:

Platt, with all due respect, is this the way MoQ thinking suggests that we
live with eachother and treat eachother?

The thing that strikes me about reading ZMM and Lila is the compassion,
tolerance, respect and empathy the narrator and Phaedrus (as representing
intellectual patterns of value) feel when experiencing and dealing
with organic- and social patterns of value of which it knows damn well it's
an integral part.

Nothing of this I saw reflected in Ham's post  nor in your comment so it
seems, being protective of his ideas.

A final observation: I have never been allowed to think like me.My everyday
experiences were always forced into patterns that had to adhere to the SOM
logic and interpretation. I have never felt comfortable with this.

Out comes Pirsig and I do recognise the "lost, subdued part"... the part
which has never been allowed to express itself. And judging from the sales
of ZMM I am not the only one. This is a relief, but is does take some
getting used to, in terms of expressing and verbalising, after 50 odd years.

To hear terms like "segregation" on the basis of race, colour and creed
under the (presumed ) umbrella of MoQ thinking "fills me with the urge to
defecate".

Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to