>
>
> [Arlo]
> Again I have to chuckle at the idea of a cadre of American sportsmen
defeating
> the US Military (I'm assuming your talking about the British Military
being
> complicit, because THEY have weapons, and yet it is the lack of civilian
> weaponry that alarms you).
>
> Does this mean you favor legalizing military-grade weaponry for the
civilian
> population? What about surface to air missile launchers, flame throwers
and
> bazookas. Wouldn't they be a whole lot more useful in a revolution than a
few
> pop-guns and muzzle loaders? Grenades? Anti-tank weapons? (We'd need them,
for
> sure, wouldn't we?)

mel
Not to put too fine a point on it, but:
1)
the Somali's didn't seem to be too awfully daunted
by "professional soldiers"
2)
a lot of Sprtsmen would be current or former military
and if the cause was right, well we've split the American
army in two before.
3)
given the same competence, I'd rather be shot at by
an M16 than a full load 30.06
4)
$30 worth of nesting pipe, $4 worth of powder, a shotgun shell,
and a mild 4-foot long, one inch diameter mild steel rod will,
properly configured, punch end-to-end through an Abrams Tank.
(It's similar to a WWI weapon the Brits used that still overcomes
any of today's armor--even ablative)
5)
It might make a fun fiction novel or movie

thanks--mel



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to