Now I'm remembering. About those cultural glasses. So coooool!
Discussing schizophrenia:
"Does anybody know the point of all this?
Woman: We're all schizophrenic.
Of course we're all schizophrenic. In fact, R. D. Laing is far too
conservative when he talks about schizophrenia being a natural
response. Evolutionarily the next step, which we're all engaged in,
is multiple personality. You're all multiple personalities. There
are only two difference between you and an officially diagnosed
multiple personality: (1) the fact that you don't have to have
amnesia for how you are behaving in one context; you can remember it
in another context, (2) you can choose how to respond
contextually. Whenever you _don't_ have a choice about how you
respond in context, you are a robot. So you have two choices. You
can be a multiple personality or a robot. Choose well.
The point that we're trying to make is that the difference between
somebody who doesn't know their hallucination is a hallucination and
yourselves is only that you have developed some strategy by which you
know what is shared reality and what is not. And if you are going to
have hallucinations, you probably have them about ideas instead of
about things."
(Bandler and Grinder, frogs into PRINCES', 1979, P.52)
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
