Bo, It was intended to give some insight on the realization that "truth" is contextual not universal.
-Ron ________________________________ From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 7, 2008 4:40:42 AM Subject: Re: [MD] A fine mess Please Ron Gif me a braik. 5 Dec.you wrote: Bo before: > > Yes, Pirsig rightfully thought that (the knowledge of) Quality would > > "moderate" reason, but when returning with the MOQ and its levels the > > 4th. is as static as the rest and can by no twist of logic be changed > > from within but like the rest have a "moderator" above itself - namely > > the Quality Metaphysics it is a sub-set of. Ron: > Not by any twist of YOUR logic, true. Alittle logical "truth" for Bo > should he care to read. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth As said to Ian logic is universal, but the premises one starts from determine the outcome and I meant by the MOQ premises ... etc. BTW what relevance has the Wikipedia article on "truth" for the MOQ or its SOL interpretation .... as you see it. Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
