Perhaps Ham is closer to a deist - a God or fundamental particle that does its bit and then sits back while the universe unfolds - no dogma, no religion.
-KO 2008/12/9 Arlo Bensinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [Steve] > Arlo has been portraying you as a theist. Do you see yourself as a theist? > > [Arlo] > To be fair, I have given Ham every opportunity to explain how this thesis > is not Theism. While he may deny the label (or else find the courage to > embrace it), there is little doubt that the logical end of his thesis is > Theism. In that sense, he wants his cake and he wants to eat it to. He wants > espouse "theism" without the messy "theism" label. So whatever Ham says > about his acceptance or denial of that label, I think its better to look at > what he actually says. The questions I've been asking him (and he's been > evading) reveal plenty. > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
