[KO] nevertheless i respect Ham for his determination to polish and hone his philosophy...
[Arlo] And I do not respect his lack of honesty over the theism in his metaphysics. I do not think the MOQ makes similar theistic claims, and perhaps that is one reason Ham rejects it as "scientism" or some such stuff. [KO] and the fact that he rarely descends into insult... [Arlo] His insults bear the wit of the sarcastic gentleman, of course not everyone is on the receiving end, just us commie, nihilistic, collectivist, anti-freedom socialists. [Ham] Also, he is the only one in this forum that outright rejects the MoQ; for that reason you could say his presence here is essential. [Arlo] I do respect Ham's outright dissent, at least he admits his position rather than trying to subvert Pirsig under the guise of supporting him. I don't know how "essential" his presence is for me, but if you find dissent helps you hone your philosophy, that's good enough. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
