Joe / Platt, ----- Original Message ----- <snip>
>Joe: > ³Emergence² is a loaded word that seems to change meaning as we explore > evolutionary levels. Is [Evolution(ary)]* a proper word for different levels? Platt: "Emergence" doesn't explain anything. It's only a description of what happened. It has the same meaning as "oops." mel: This use of 'emergence' is descriptive, rather than explanitory-definitional and it is intended to be from the level of 'many simple parts, with simple rules, interacting in large numbers for resultant behaviors (en masse) that are inexplicable in complexity in their aggregate'...unpredictable in capability if all-you -have-to-look-at is the rule set for the simple parts. *Joe, we have used "evolutionary" in that way, yes. Thanks--mel Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
