Hello, Ham: ----- Original Message ----- <snip> Ham: This is no great breakthrough, Krimel; Eastern mystics and Western > theologians have accepted the concept of an immutable source for thousands > of years. Why should we reject this idea simply because we're opposed to > the dogma of a "personal diety"? <snip>
mel: Not to be flippant, but in the light of the way Dynamism is a part of these discussions, maybe the way to look at the vanishing point of regression is the: Infinitely Mutable Source of Infinite Mutability. ...although that does not make a good acronym. "May the: IMSOIM, InMuS, InfMut, IMSo, etc. be with you." (definitely clumsy) Seriously, though, we seem to have exercised and conceit by putting constraints on an effectively infinite universe and beyond by dictating that it by unchangeable. thanks--mel Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
