just a quick point:
dq needs to be hindered. too much dynamism leads to degeneracy - pirsig is
clear on this. intellectual sq patterns need to be flexible in order to
maintain an optimal dynamic/static balance. rigid laws are not the way either.
remember what bob said about 'care'? i think that is central here. the ethical
spine of an intellectually guided society is care. the ethics of permaculture
are: care of the earth, care of the people and share the surplus, in no
particular order.
care....what is 'care'? interesting that the legal system often invokes the
phrase 'duty of care'...but this seems like a superficial rendering....not
really care but the avoidance of litigation, or at best doing the 'right'
thing. true care is existential - it is to be affected by the situation, by the
situation of *others*. it is felt.
if we care for the planet, each other and ourselves.....what need for laws?
maybe the question is why don't we care?
Stay connected to the people that matter most with a smarter inbox. Take
a look http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/smarterinbox
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
