Ham:
If wiki is unsuitable how about the stanford encyclopedia of philosphy?

Egalitarianism is a contested concept in social and political thought. One 
might care about human equality in many ways, for many reasons. As currently 
used, the label "egalitarian" does not necessarily indicate that the doctrine 
so called holds that it is desirable that people's condition be made the same 
in any respect or that people ought to be treated the same in any respect. An 
egalitarian might rather be one who maintains that people ought to be treated 
as equals--as possessing equal fundamental worth and dignity and as equally 
morally considerable. In this sense, a sample nonegalitarian would be one who 
believes that people born into a higher social caste, or a favored race or 
ethnicity, or with an above-average stock of traits deemed desirable, ought 
somehow to count for more than others in calculations that determine what 
morally ought to be done. (On the thought that the core egalitarian ideal is 
treating people as equals, see Dworkin 2000.)
 Further norms of equality of condition or treatment might be viewed as 
free-standing or derived from the claim of equality of status. Controversy also 
swirls around attempts to specify the class of human persons to whom 
egalitarian norms apply. Some might count an unborn fetus or a very severely 
demented human as persons; others disagree. 

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/

 



________________________________
From: X Acto <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2009 10:23:37 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Multiculturalism scam

Ham:
 The alternative is turning out human beings in the same mold, 
with no differences, no original ideas, no unique aptitudes or 
personalities, no powers of discrimination.  That's the dull, gray 
world of egalitarianism where nothing and no one is better or 
worse than anything or anyone else.  Go find it, if you can. 
 I choose to stay here where I can value Difference.

Ron:
Doesent this go against your thesis? that each individual has unique agency?
therefore what you fear can not exist by virtue of Essentialism correct?



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to