Hi Steve
18 Jan.you wrote: after I had said: > > Regarding truth I wonder what the problem is? Need it any > > particular definition beyond the one given by the MOQ? The early > > Greek thinkers' search for eternal principle that ended with the > > greatest principle of them all TRUTH. In a SOL interpretation this > > was intellect emerging from the old mythological social level. So > > truth is a static intellectual pattern, the notion of a rock bottom > > reality that science and knowledge will uncover if the search goes > > on and on. > Steve: > But is this notion of truth as a rock bottom reality true? The S/O split as reality's ground - known as SOM - has been proved false by the MOQ. Thereby both camps of SOM (the objective-over-subjective that claims that TRUTH is objective, as well as the subjective-over-objective that claims that TRUTH is subjective - are wrong. Reality's ground is the DQ/SQ split, but the MOQ also says that the S/O isn't to be rejected, but relegated the role as its own highest/best static level. Static meaning that it's true for all "pragmatic" needs, but fails, i.e. start to produce paradoxes - the moment one begin to examining things metaphysically through its glasses. Wops, there I went pragmatic too ;-) Then the final question: Is the DQ/SQ split true. Yes, because no platypis has shown, least not by the SOL interpretation. Bo Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
