Hey Andre, I think Michael is approaching this pragmatically, the question being "is theism usefull in a Quality way?"??? sure, but it also perpetuates objectivism (SOM) which is the downside which ultimately will interfere with a quality understanding of what MoQ proposes. In effect when it comes right down to the major abstract concepts and their understanding, the two will conflict. This is what needs to be expressed to him.. Utimately essentialism is the problem. - Ron
Hi Ron, Platt, MP and All, Yes, perhaps I was bit harsh on MP and Ishould appreciate the good intentions. Of course every pattern is allowed to be free to believe in what he/she likes but, on this Discuss, to even suggest a hint at 'Quality' having some theistic connotations does not help. If Mp's God has quality, fine, but I'd rather frame it as Quality having his God. For what it's worth. Andre Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
