>Marsha >Science is not an independent entity. Who does science for its own >sake these days? Are you a gentlemen scientist? I don't think >so. The underpinnings of science are corporate, economic, and >political, all driven by the profit margin. Of course you might add >hubris to the list of supports. > >[Krimel] >Science has suffered tragically for the past eight years under an >administration whose central theme seems to have been, "we were told there >would be no math..." Pure research has typically been funded by the federal >government at the university level. That it has not been adequately funded, >is a serious problem that the new administration seems committed to >correcting. (It is soooooo refreshing to have smart people in charge for a >change.) But again the problems are political not scientific. Of course >science is not independent but the problems that you bitch about are not >scientific, they are, as I keep trying to tell you, political, economic and >philosophical. Try to keep up, will you?
Marsha Science is corporate, economic, and political. [Krimel] So far in your three post sputter all you have done is restate my case for me. Thanks! Marsha . _____________ Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars......... . . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
