________________________________
From: Michael
Ron:
Would you consider consistency of predictions valuable? for this IS science.
Wherefore
Religion rests soley on reason in terms of justification. Reading up on the
process of
scientific method from positivism to Quantum theory would shed quite a bit of
light
on the arguement you forward. Also research deductive and inductive method as
it relates to scientific inquirey in the last two centuries.
MP
----
"Don't believe everything you think."
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Hume, Locke, you know what they say about reason. Its all just a guess at
what's going on; we can never consider anything "real", we can only consider it
consistent. Reason as a means of understanding doesn't get us very far and so
neither do scientific theories. They just make experience more predictable.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
