Marsha you posted Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:17:
>[Marsha] >I am not a Materialist. RMP has stated that the MOQ accepts Materialism as long at it is understood to be a set of >ideas. I am curious about science and Krimel's views for that reason, but I think he doesn't understand his scientific >pov as a set of ideas but thinks of them as reality itself. So yours and Krimels explanation are conventional >explanations that reflect the questions being asked by a particular group of scientists and reflect the method being >used to >discover the answer. Those three little sentences of Krimel's had >me confused so I thought I'd ask for clarification. Your explanation was interesting too. Happy day Marsha: I'm a married grandfather still working full-time, reading and writing so the pace you people keep seems blistering to me. Finally someone (you) asked a few questions that, for me at least, had straightforward answers. I've read ZAMM and Lila and a few online essays but I only understand about half of what I read. I'm getting it more and more often and I'm optimistic about the future, the MoQ seems to be a workable metaphysics for my belief system. I just feel a kinship with Krimel because while we seem to disagree about most things, we share a frustration with MoQ's mystic assertions. -david swift Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
