At 07:24 PM 3/8/2009, you wrote:
Marsha you posted Sun, 08 Mar 2009 17:17:
>[Marsha]
>I am not a Materialist. RMP has stated that the MOQ accepts Materialism as
long at it is understood to be a set of >ideas. I am curious about science
and Krimel's views for that reason, but I think he doesn't understand his
scientific >pov as a set of ideas but thinks of them as reality itself. So
yours and Krimels explanation are conventional >explanations that reflect
the questions being asked by a particular group of scientists and reflect
the method being >used to
>discover the answer. Those three little sentences of Krimel's had
>me confused so I thought I'd ask for clarification. Your explanation was
interesting too.
Happy day Marsha:
I'm a married grandfather still working full-time, reading and writing so
the pace you people keep seems blistering to me. Finally someone (you) asked
a few questions that, for me at least, had straightforward answers. I've
read ZAMM and Lila and a few online essays but I only understand about half
of what I read. I'm getting it more and more often and I'm optimistic about
the future, the MoQ seems to be a workable metaphysics for my belief system.
I just feel a kinship with Krimel because while we seem to disagree about
most things, we share a frustration with MoQ's mystic assertions. -david
swift
David,
Don't let Krimel fool you, he's a wizard, as mystical as the
next. The patterns are interesting, story telling at its finest,
having both happy and sad endings, so keep those scientific questions
and answers flowing.
Marsha
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
