> [Platt] > In the deterministic world of science, chance is a measure of ignorance. > When a > scientist doesn't know what causes a certain effect, like mind emerging > from > mud, the effect is attributed to chance... > > [Arlo] > How does "chance" differ from "Dynamic Quality"? It sounds to me, every > time > you say this, that you posit "intent" to Dynamic Quality. True? If not, > what > are the distinctions? > > Because I tell ya, aside from your allusions to DQ being an "intentional > force"(Qualigod), I don't see any distinction. And if DQ "makes" things > happen, > what does that say about human agency? Or does DQ only deliberately order > the > inorganic-biological levels?
So what do you attribute mind emerging from mud? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
