[Michael]
I don't expect there to be a clear cut MoQ moral answer..

[Arlo]
Here's my answer. Keeping in mind that the reasons many women choose abortion are complicated and varied... And keep in mind that these examples are purposefully simplistic.

The MOQ values the life of the unborn child over MOST biological, social and intellectual patterns. Having an abortion to escape social stigma, for example, would be an example of something the MOQ would say is immoral. However, having an abortion to save the life of the mother I would think the MOQ would say is moral. Incest becomes tricky, as society has loudly made the claim that incest threatens social stability. In this case it may be that aborting children of incest is society's way of disavowing the act, that denying abortion in these cases is tantamount to condoning the act. The same could be said of instances of rape. In both cases of incest and rape, it may increase the acts of these types of violence if the perpetrater felt he could "force" the birthing of a child on the woman. Here I think the MOQ allows society the benefit of allowing behaviors that may decrease acts of violence that would lead to greater social disruption. By giving the woman freedom to choose, it may lessen acts of violence perpetrated against her.

So I think "abortion", like "capital punishment", is an area that in and of itself is not moral or immoral, but the reasons behind it may lead to it being so. For example, Pirsig has stated that capital punishment is immoral except in cases where it can be demonstrated that incarceration of the prisoner itself still threatens society, and Pirsig alludes to cases of treason or insurrection. "But if an established social structure is not seriously threatened by a criminal, then an evolutionary morality would argue that there is no moral justification for killing him." (LILA)

Here we see that it is not "killing a prisoner" per se that falls under the moral knife, but the reasons we do such things. In one case, killing a prisoner may be wholly immoral, in another it may be the most moral thing we can do. (The same is true of eating animal flesh, according to Pirsig. In times of plenty, eating animals is immoral. In times of starvation, eating animals is very moral.)

Going back the idea of abortion to preserve the social life of the mother, one could argue that a society that condones this devalues human life to the point where the very fabric of society is threatened. However, denying abortion in all cases may do the same thing. What, I suppose, should be asked (but can't be unless you are privy to the intimate details and particularities involved) is "why" a particular abortion occurs, and whether or not those reasons violate the MOQ hierarchy or preserve it.

Again, keeping in mind the ridiculously simplistic reduction of these examples, I'd say (1) a woman in her thirties having consensual sex and decides to abort so that she doesn't have to deal with a kid, may be very morally distinct from (2) a teenage girl who is raped by her uncle or (2a) a woman whose doctor determines will die as a result of childbirth. Obviously (to restate), no real life situation is as simplistic as these, but in a very broad stroke you get the idea.

What would be abhorrent would be to set up a "tribunal" to make such a decision. Ultimately, the decision must remain the woman's.

There are also related social issues that must be addressed. Consider, a woman living in poverty. If we deny her the abortion (valuing the life of the child), what do we then do to value that child's life once its been born? Consider a woman who chooses an abortion lest she risk losing her job. If we suggest its immoral to do so, then isn't it equally immoral for that woman to lose her job because she gave birth to this child? Do we not show our value for human life by defending that woman's ability to keep her employment? Isn't it hypocritical to say "human life is sacred, but if you get fired for having a child that's just free-market economics"? If we want to minimize abortions that occur for reasons other than incest, rape or imminent threat to the mother's life, we have to also address the reasons woman may make this choice. And another one of these is social stigma. How absurd is it that we demonize young women who have abortions, but stigmatize those who keep the child?

Anyways, these are just some thoughts.



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to