Michael and Andre 17 March.
Michael writes: > The degree of personal vindiction in here is thick enough to cut with > a knife. Its too bad. It makes thinking things through with words in > here *very* difficult. Why can't we all agree to respect each others' > views, listen to ideas and thoughts, debate them, even with vigor, but > not make it *personal*? There are some here who seem to have no > problem doing so. Hi Michael If this pertains to Ron Kulp's "blow-out" I certainly agree about listening to ideas, but never mind him. Not to get personal, but he is desperate for attention and when I don't bother with him he gets pissed. I've been through such before and am impervious, if only the MOQ (as I interprets it) serves me I'm fine. Andre writes: > I know that Bodvar can look after himself but do want to say this: I > cannot think of anyone here on this Discuss being more committed to the > MoQ than he is. He has defended his SOL/ MOQ position for more than ten > years now and has copped flack from many. He has also pulled many into > line when he felt they were straying too far from the MoQ path. And has > been appreciated for that! Thanks a lot Andre, I may be single-minded to the point of monomania and have "pestered" this discussion with the SOL interpretation of the MOQ for X years, but for the reason that it IS the MOQ and by now there is no opposition to it except when people has to take a stand, then they either "don't understand" or "the MOQ is Pirsig's property" *). *) Note that Pirsig always says "..the MOQ", never "my MOQ" Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
