Can we please have some MoQ responses to this: > Steve wrote: > In considering the MOQ's take on the abortion issue it may be helpful > to consider he MOQ's understanding of humanity. A human being is a > forest of patterns of all four types. A biological homo sapien is not > automatically human just for having the right DNA. A homo sapien > without any social patterns is a purely biological entity--an animal. > It is impossible for me to consider a zygote to be a person, and the > MOQ can't see it that way either since a zygote cannot participate in > social patterns.
Is this an accurate reckoning of MoQ's understanding of the "evolution" of a human life, and more importantly how that human life compares to other life during its "evolution"? A little help here MoQers? DMB? Ron? Arlo? Anyone? It makes MoQ sense to me, I'd like to know if its MoQ. If it is, it answers quite clearly I think the entire "life" issue I identified at the outset as the underpinning of subsequent discussion. MP ---- "Don't believe everything you think." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
