At 01:07 PM 4/14/2009, you wrote:
At 01:00 PM 4/14/2009, you wrote:
Marsha
Betterness from the point-of-view of 'this world' as compared to the
betterness of DQ's total freedom? Is this the betterness
missing? Well you may be correct. There doesn't seem to be any
consideration for stability in most of the scientific drive for
economic progress. I like better James Lovelock's Gaia
point-of-view, which says that in the end Earth will survive as it is
a self-correcting system. Mr. Lovelock is also optimistic in
thinking that there will be humans that survive too. And the Gaia
hypothesis seems more like the MOQ interrelationship between static
and dynamic forces.
[Krimel]
But that's all JUST conceptual patterns.
Hi,
I've been waiting for you. But you disappoint me because of course
that's all JUST conceptual patterns. I've said it before, and will
repeat it again, I'm just a conventional girl, living in a conventional world.
Hope you are listening to all 24 CBC episodes.
Marsha
Krimel,
You've claimed to have studied Buddhism, then surely you are familiar
with the two truths doctrine. You know, mountains are mountains
again? The conventional is the way the world has come to function,
and one can be perfectly comfortable using concepts while knowing
they do not represent the ultimate truth.
And I was anticipating your attack.
Marsha
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
