Krimel said:
The MoQ does add a metaphysical underpinning for evolutionary theory. Both are 
about how stability arises and persists in the face of dynamic change. Or to 
put it more boldly how Order arises from Chaos. This is the most basic and 
fundamental theme in both the Mythos and the Logos. The reason evolutionary 
theory is so pervasive and crosses so many disciplines is that it addresses 
this theme. This is what gives evolutionary theory its elegance, beauty and 
power. I am always disappointed when Chapter 11 comes up because in it Pirsig 
shows he does not appreciate the power of evolutionary thinking nor how the MoQ 
really serves to enhance it. His focus on betterness and acceptance of a 
teleological account of evolution contribute mightily to keeping the MoQ on the 
fringe.

dmb says:
Although you've not said so explicitly this time, I can see that you are once 
again equating DQ with Chaos. That construes DQ as confusion, disorder and 
randomness. This is approximately the opposite of what Pirsig says about it. It 
is not "arbitrary or capricious", he says. It's the basis of the order and 
harmony of the static ordered world. I'd also object because the term more or 
less refers to a disorganized physical state while DQ is not a state of things 
but an event, an experience. And this is where the betterness comes in. Its 
better to be off the hot stove, for example. The idea here is that DQ is a 
sense that guides and pulls or pushes in a direction that will improve the 
situation. This way of sensing the overall quality of the situation, positive 
or negative, is at the cutting edge of every moment and is the basis on which 
we select what to notice within the overall situation and then these noticed 
features are organized according to a conceptual framework, the categories of 
language and all that. In this cutting edge moment, the first thing you know is 
a generalized feeling tone, a sense of the quality of the situation. As we see 
in the language of radical empiricism this is the pure experience prior to the 
distinction even between experiencer and what's being experienced, between 
subject and object, between your burning ass and the hot stove. You immediately 
know its bad even before you know what or why. And this is the sense in which 
there is a teleology. Its not that some final outcome has already been decided 
and everything inevitable moves toward this end. Its just that things move in a 
general direction, although at different levels, in different contexts. I mean 
betterness in philosophy isn't the same as betterness in hunting, love-making 
or rock music. Vultures and I have very different ideas about what's better for 
dinner and yet we DO both have our preferences and we both act upon them. Can 
you think of anything that does not move in the direction of betterness, within 
its own terms I mean?  Krimel said:
...the more I read of Eastern thinking the more I see that like western 
thinking there are factions and subtexts and internal arguments and that any 
characterization of "Eastern Thinking" is as much an over simplification as 
talking about "Western Thinking". Both are rich enough and diverse enough to 
resist being lump together as one entity.

dmb says:
Yea, I've heard objections like that before. The point would be more worth 
making, I suppose, if somebody used such broad categories to make absolutist 
claims or assert universal truths or whatever. But there's nothing wrong with 
generalizations. They're neither more nor less useful than any other 
abstraction. And since Pirsig's work is a fusion of Eastern and Western 
philosophies, you'll have to tolerate or even (gasp!) use these terms.



_________________________________________________________________
Rediscover HotmailĀ®: Now available on your iPhone or BlackBerry
http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Mobile2_042009
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to