Krimel,
I know how endlessly fascinated you are with your own frame of
reference, but it doesn't do much for me. Now one has made you King
of the World yet. Argue its flaws after reading it, or don't read
it, but why blather on about what you do not know.
Marsha
At 02:49 PM 4/26/2009, you wrote:
[Marsha]
Buddhism and Science: Probing the Boundaries of Faith and Reason by
Dr. Martin J. Verhoeven
"Science is interested in the precise analysis and study of the
material world, and it has no heart. It knows nothing about love or
compassion or righteousness or purity of mind. It doesn't know the
inner world of humankind."
http://www.dharmaweb.org/index.php/Buddhism_and_Science:_Probing_the_Boundar
ies_of_Faith_and_Reason_by_Dr._Martin_J._Verhoeven
[Krimel]
Dharmaweb?
Featuring a Buddhist scholar?
The meeting of East and West with the West looking dumb?
Science versus Religion with religion winning?
As John Stewart might say, "How utterly, precedented?"
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
