At 11:13 AM 4/30/2009, you wrote:
Marsha:
The age of the universe would be shorter than the age of oldest stars. This
contradiction implies that either 1) our measurement of the Hubble constant
is incorrect, 2) the Big Bang theory is incorrect or 3) that we need a form
of matter like a cosmological constant that implies an older age for a given
observed expansion rate
Hi Marsha,
Or that there are/ have been more 'bangs'.?
Andre
Bangettes? Do-lang-do-lang-do-lang...
.
_____________
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
