[WillBlake]
You pick and choose your PC efforts, I will choose mine. That was my opinion
from my original email. Glad to see you are coming around.

[Arlo]
I do hope you are kidding. If not, man, this has got to rank you with the most
distortive rhetoric I've seen here. Really. Ai yi yi.

It was MY point. MINE. YOU just railed against that empty strawman of "PC". It
was ME who said you have to provide EXAMPLE, that you have to give CONTEXT, and
only THEN can we argue that THIS is good or THAT is bad.

Your "opinion" was simply "PC is bad, mmkay". My opinion was to examine
specific contexts, to make judgments on contexts independently of other
contexts. 

And now you write this. My god man, you are really, really aligning yourself
with some atrocious rhetoric. Very, very, very sad. 

Each time you responded me with distortive rhetoric, I pointed it out, asked
you to respond to it (you never did) and let it pass. From your kneejerk
reactions, to your unsubstantiated accusations, to your inability to provide
one iota of support for your claims, I really don't know what the point is
anymore. Like with Platt, you seem bent on derailing the dialogue using some
awful rhetorical devices. Why is that?




Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to