> > > > > 57. In the MOQ time is dependent on experience > > > independently of matter. Matter is a deduction from > > > experience. > > > > > > > So we just toss E=mc2 out the window? > > > > I think (unless it can be explained better to me) that the realization of > > object precedes or arises with the realization of time. Time = change > and > > you can't have "change" without some"thing" changing. > > > > John > > My wife changes her mind all the time. :-) > > Platt > > Well I thought about it a bit Platt, and I'm still confused. But not about time and space. Heck, those are obvious. Just look at your watch and glance around you. There. I guess I'm confused about this thing called "metaphysics". You'd think with years of discussion and a plain goal like Quality, there'd be plenty of evidence of harmony and unity of thought. That's one of the purposes of philosophy, is it not?
And yet something as plain and elementary as "time is independent of matter" slips under the rug. I mean, my wife changes her mind too, but rationality must prevail in the household. So where is it, hmm? I mean, I hope _you_ are not going to tell me to go subjectively stimulate myself... Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
