hey mate,
geez men shit me! not you bro, but so many are pig-headed ignorant sods. poor 
women. 
more women please! more real conversation, more wisdom. been reading anais 
nin's diaries - beautiful and powerful. without her henry miller would not have 
been henry miller.
i just explained quite exactly, carefully and subtly, the central point re: SOM 
and itsĀ  denial of the aesthetic and krimel doesn't bother reading it! what is 
the point indeed.
i think i will limit myself to folks that are awake from now on.
all the best as always dave
g
ps the reactive vehemence of matt, krimel etc reveals much. you are hitting 
sore points that they both are afraid to deal with/look at. it is their shit 
mate, not yours, but you know that.

--- On Tue, 26/5/09, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:

From: david buchanan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MD] LC: Expanded Annotation 57
To: [email protected]
Received: Tuesday, 26 May, 2009, 4:07 AM


Thanks, Gav. 
But poor Sisyphus had it much worse than me. Anyone who's ever washed the 
dishes knows that repeating the same old chores is just a fact of life. At 
least I don't have to deal with boulders or vultures so the gods don't seem to 
be punishing me quite yet. Usually, when I repeat a task it's just normal work 
and around here it's actually kind of fun.
Did you notice Matt's reaction the other day? He told me to fuck off and then 
suggested that we're really blood brothers. How sweet is that? That's really 
all the thanks I need. You know, I'm human. I enjoy the debates and the heat 
they generate but, every once in while, it's really nice when someone can put 
the philosophy aside for a moment and say to the other guy, "fuck you, pal". 
That's what makes it all worthwhile, you know?

dmb.


> dave,
> it is time your patience was acknowledged my fine friend!
> your task may seem sisyphean at times, but i guess sisyphus was happy! 
> (according to camus anyway).
> 
> krimel....i guess it is painful to bear the brunt of dave's 
> explanations...but his somewhat sardonic humour is probably what keeps him 
> sane - explaining over and over and over again.
> 
> krimel, dave is, in my opinion (and bob's), bob's most faithful adherent. 
> this is good to bear in mind when you remember where you are.
> it may be that you are mistaken (rather than pirsig, ant, dave, me, etc etc 
> being so). have you considered this possibility seriously? 
> 
> i guess it depends on why you are here: to proselytize blindly like 
> platt/ham, or to engage in a true dialectical exchange - in the interest of 
> mutual growth, evolution.
> 
> you are sharp krimel. but you are also arrogant. 
> 
> cheers
> gav




_________________________________________________________________
HotmailĀ® has a new way to see what's up with your friends.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/WhatsNew?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_WhatsNew1_052009
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      Need a Holiday? Win a $10,000 Holiday of your choice. Enter 
now.http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5lBHRtX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A//au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tagline/creativeholidays/*http%3A//au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/%3Fp1=other%26p2=au%26p3=mailtagline
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to