interesting dave.
is meliorism best served by denying reincarnation? by avoiding the issue of 
death and what happens after?
i dunno
i tend to think we have skirted around the very natural issue of death in the 
west, whereas in the east you could say they have *empirical* evidence of what 
happens...tibetan book of the dead etc
autobiography of a yogi also deals with this issue in depth - the triune 
reality, a la tarot: physical, astral and causal planes of existence. 
according to what i have read on the subject we are reborn on the astral plane 
when we die, returning to earth if we need to to work out any remaining stuff 
(karma)....once that is done the same to and fro twixt the astral and causal 
planes.
the east's traditional ease and resignation vis-a-vis death, relative to the 
west at least, is more amenable to caring for what exists beyond this 
incarnation...if we know that death is a transformation and that we will likely 
return to earth one day....easier to give a shit i'd say. and in any case - 
your reason for being here, the point of it all: to evolve, to become perfect, 
to move forever towards quality....does this not mean more than living and 
dying in some brief, meaningless and dull existence? which one rings true?

are we really in a position to say that all this stuff on death and dying is 
irrelevant - can we pick and choose like that? is that good?
i would say that if the rest of buddhism,hinduism, seems to gel with the MOQ, 
chances are the death stuff does too.

death....and beyond....we don't deal with it really....we are ignorant and 
therefore scared.






--- On Thu, 28/5/09, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:

From: david buchanan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [MD] An Introduction to Robert Pirsig's Metaphysics of Quality
To: [email protected]
Received: Thursday, 28 May, 2009, 4:24 AM


Marsha quoted from Dr. McWatt's textbook, "An Introduction to Robert Pirsig's 
Metaphysics of Quality":
>From 5.8.0. Differences Between the MOQ and Eastern Philosophy:

"Despite keeping within Eastern understanding (by using Dynamic Quality) to 
incorporate the theory of evolution, Pirsig discards any notion of 
reincarnation or rebirth in the MOQ.  This is probably due to his avoidance of 
supernatural explanations wherever possible.

"For scientists, the mind of the Buddha and the Mind of God are usually the 
same, even though the Buddha was an atheist.  I think it is extremely important 
to emphasize that the MOQ is pure empiricism.  There is nothing supernatural in 
it."    (Pirsig, 2000e)

Instead of trying to achieve a better situation in your next life, the primary 
moral imperative in Pirsig's system is the effect your behavior will have on 
your descendants.  This is probably the widest departure of the MOQ from the 
Indo-Chinese tradition."


dmb says:Thanks, Marsha & Ant. 
If I'm reading this right, making the switch from re-incarnation to one's 
descendants removes supernaturalism from the picture but retains a moral stance 
about future lives. The moral imperative is still directed beyond the present 
but it remains earthbound. Putting this moral stance within the context of the 
theory of evolution, I think, alters the way we think about the nature of that 
process. The aim isn't just a matter of continued survival but a matter of 
assuming some responsibility for ensuring a better future. There is a dimension 
of betterness that is uniquely Pirsigian, I think, but most Pragmatist 
emphasize this idea. 
"MELIORISM: noun, Philosophy, the belief that the world can be made better by 
human effort, from Latin, melior = 'better' + ISM."
There are several commonly known phrases that suggest we're not very moral in 
this respect; "global warming", "peak oil", "nuclear war", "second-coming" and 
"strip malls". 
I mean, this moral stance is not about the fate of your own soul or even the 
well-being of your own great, great, great, great, great, grandchildren. This 
is an unselfish imperative, no? Do unto your descendants seven generations from 
now as you would have your ancestors from seven generations ago do unto you. 
Okay, that's a pretty clumsy sentence but you get the picture.





_________________________________________________________________
Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      Need a Holiday? Win a $10,000 Holiday of your choice. Enter 
now.http://us.lrd.yahoo.com/_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5lBHRtX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A//au.rd.yahoo.com/mail/tagline/creativeholidays/*http%3A//au.docs.yahoo.com/homepageset/%3Fp1=other%26p2=au%26p3=mailtagline
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to