On 8 Jun 2009 at 9:09, X Acto wrote: > > > Platt: > Guess you missed the part in Lila where Pirsig talks about socialism > vs. free markets. He also talks about human rights and why SOM > intellectuals are incapable of governing properly (they lack morals). I > could go on. But the most relevant premise of the MOQ supporting > Nick's thesis is the nature of DQ: "It contains no pattern of fixed rewards > and punishments. Its only perceived good is freedom and its only > perceived evil is static quality itself-any pattern of one-sided fixed > values that tries to contain and kill the ongoing free force of life." (Lila, > 9) > > Ron: > And Platt, you know WHY those intellectuals are imoral? because they thought > of > themselves as individuals, they valued their individual biological desires > over social > quality. Like greed and hedonism. Gomorrah my freind.
Where did you ever get that idea? Did you just make it up? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
