On Aug 27, 2009, at 1:26 PM, X Acto wrote:

See, I think this was Daves beef,
Rorty did'nt have betterness and value
to support his claims so his ideas were
colored as a kind of relativism.


Hi Ron,

Pirsig doesn't have any sort of copyright on "betterness."

From Rorty's Philosophy and Social Hope:

"Pragmatists do not believe there is a way things really are. So they want to replace the appearance-reality distinction by that between descriptions of the world and ourselves which are less useful and those which are more useful. When the question 'useful for what?' is pressed, they have nothing to say except 'useful to create a better future.' When they are asked, 'Better by what criterion?', they have no detailed answer, any more than the first mammals could specify in what respects they were better than the dying dinosaurs. Pragmatists can only say something as vague as: Better in the sense of containing more of what is good and less of what is bad. When asked, 'And exactly what do you consider good?', pragmatists can only say with Whitman 'variety and freedom,' or with Dewey, 'growth.' 'Growth itself,' Dewey said, 'is the only moral end.'" "The are limited to such fuzzy and unhelpful answers because what they hope is not that the future will conform to a plan, will fulfil an immanent teleology, but rather that the future will astonish and exhilarate. Just as fans of the avant garde go to art galleries wanting to be astonished rather than wanting to have some specific expectation fulfilled..." "So if Whitman and Dewey have anything in common, it is their principled and deliberate fuzziness. For principled fuzziness is the American way of doing what Heidegger called 'getting beyond metaphysics.'

That sounds a lot like dynamic quality to me, and it sounds like Pirsig and Rorty have a lot in common.

"Principled fuzziness." Do you like that?

Best,
Steve

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to