you not answering my questions is boring too
Logic requires objective reasoning, it is constructed on the idea of concrete
forms.
S/o is a construction built into our cultural glasses. If not, and it's the
natural way
to see and interpret reality as a human being, then what is the use of MoQ?
Everything Pirsig says about SOM being an artifical construction, just "one of
many ways
to interpret reality" is therefore wrong and incorrect and makes SOM correct,
the natural
way humans see the world, other cultures are simply undeveloped. Other ways
including
DQ/SQ are false, it makes seeing things as patterns a construction and seeing
things
as objects natural. DQ/SQ is simply a construction invented by a man named
Robert
Pirsig, he did not discover DQ/SQ under a microscope or in a supercollider he
invented
it. So why disregard the natural way we percieve reality for one mans invention?
why call an object a collection of patterns? when an object is truer to our
perception?
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
