On 11/29/09 11:29 PM, "Ham Priday" <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> For the record, Essence is immutable and indivisible. It does not evolve or branch out into pluralistic layers of quality, however you define them. No wonder you are confused! There are no "essences". All of the above cited "levels" are your own intellectual construct (reification) of experience. <snip> Hi Ham and all, There is a tune that keeps running through my head: You have to accentuate the positive. Eliminate the negative. Pass on to the affirmative. And don¹t mess with Mister in between. As I try to make sense of your negation of essence for individuated reality I get into a very negative place. Are you being negative when you propose that, or are you just trying to communicate your vision? I don¹t know whose record you are recounting, but a negative take on reality is very idealistic. Joe > For the record, Essence is immutable and indivisible. It does not evolve or > branch out into pluralistic layers of quality, however you define them. No > wonder you are confused! There are no "essences". All of the above cited > "levels" are your own intellectual construct (reification) of experience. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
