On 16 Dec 2009 at 12:50, Arlo Bensinger wrote:

> [Platt]
> No, yer a fake Christian lover as well as a fatuous arguer.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Why? I'm the one saying their saviour acted on selfless altruism. YOU 
> are the one saying he was egoistic and selfish. And I love Christians 
> no more and no less than I love Buddhists or Sioux. But again, I do 
> realize your talk-radio repertoire does not leave you with many options.
> 
> And, you can clear this up, Platt, I've asked you before...
> 
> Wait, unless you think that Jesus' actions were NOT selfish and 
> egoistic.. but how can that BE? I mean, it must've brought joy to his 
> heart to "save" the human race. By your definition, this makes him 
> selfish and egoistic.
> 
> But you can't answer.. so I expect just another round of "Christian 
> hater"... toss in a "commie" or "evil leftist" while you are at it... 
> those terms are feeling lonely.

No point in answering a fatuous argument based on a false accusation, 
even if it would satisfy your egotistic selfish beliefs. As Mary recently 
wrote and I agree, "Everything I believe is designed to make me feel 
better (or, ok, to be really honest, superior) in some way or another.  
Who among you can stand up and disagree with that? :)."         
        
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to