>> Ham: >> Pirsig has equated Quality with Value, stating that "a thing that has no >> value doesn't exist:." His epistemology is correct, in that things >> (objective phenomena) are experiential constructs or representations of >> value-sensibility. He is wrong, however, in assuming that Quality or Value >> exists apart from that sensibility. If there is no sensibility, there is no >> experience, in which case neither things nor Value can be realized. An >> unrealized world doesn't exist. The "opposite" of Quality is Nothingness. >> >> This isn't an issue of chaos vs. quality; > > > Marsha: > Exactly!!! The minute you compare the two you are so far off the track > you're swimming with an octopus. >
Marsha qualifies statement: I mean the above statement only from my point-of-view; I have no claim on the truth. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
